Monday, March 18, 2013
Reading Difficulties Pages 102-118
"In a few days the Eldorado Expedition went into the patient wilderness, that closed upon it as the sea closes over a diver. Long afterwards the news came that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals. They, no doubt, like the rest of us, found what they deserved. I did not inquire. I was then rather excited at the prospect of meeting Kurtz very soon. When I say very soon I mean it comparatively. It was just two months from the day we left the creek when we came to the bank below Kurtz's station"(Page 105, 3rd paragraph). In this section the narrator talks about the fact that the donkeys of the Eldorado Expedition all died. This part confused me because it jumps around a lot and it was unclear to me why this particular section is significant? Also when the narrator says the part "They, no doubt, like the rest of us, found what they deserved", he is seemingly referring to the Donkeys, but the language of "they found what they deserved" is difficult to decipher. This section could mean many different things and while the language itself was not difficult to understand the meaning of the section as a whole was.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Heart of Darkness Quote
"The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much" (Page 70).
I believe that this quote is the thesis of the book. In this quote Joseph Conrad completely captures the essence of
the fight for domination of the Congo. In most instances throughout history land was conquered or sought after by stronger countries because the desired land was inhabited by people thought to be lesser beings. Why would there be any room for moral conflict when capturing land if it's peoples are "less than human"? This quote captures the idea that strong countries tend to oppose any group of people who look, behave or seem different from it's people. Humans tend to fear things they do not understand or can't relate to. Conquest is by no means a pretty thing. Conquest is often sparked by fear or greed, as noted in not only this book but in King Leopold's ghost as well. While some of the goals behind conquest may be noble, the abuse of land, resources and people is "not a pretty thing". This quote wants it's readers to understand that even the slightest variation in culture or appearance could be enough motivation to sparks a countries desire for conquest.
I believe that this quote is the thesis of the book. In this quote Joseph Conrad completely captures the essence of
the fight for domination of the Congo. In most instances throughout history land was conquered or sought after by stronger countries because the desired land was inhabited by people thought to be lesser beings. Why would there be any room for moral conflict when capturing land if it's peoples are "less than human"? This quote captures the idea that strong countries tend to oppose any group of people who look, behave or seem different from it's people. Humans tend to fear things they do not understand or can't relate to. Conquest is by no means a pretty thing. Conquest is often sparked by fear or greed, as noted in not only this book but in King Leopold's ghost as well. While some of the goals behind conquest may be noble, the abuse of land, resources and people is "not a pretty thing". This quote wants it's readers to understand that even the slightest variation in culture or appearance could be enough motivation to sparks a countries desire for conquest.
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Chapter 17: No Man Is a Stranger
I am posting this from my iPhone so prepare for spelling errors to run rampant. I did the first half of chapter 17 for our presentation tomorrow. The first half of this chapter extends most of it's substance to illustrating the slow but steady downfall of Leopold's control over the congo (I know finally!).
The first section of this chapter highlights the movement of "African Testimony". The court system in
the Congo during that time was white ruled. White men and many African de facto officials didn't fear the legal system because it was inefficient and unjust. KL basically created a Commission of Inquiry of Rule. He sent for three commissioners who would make it their sole purpose to listen to the horrifying testimonies of the African people in the Congo. For the first time African people in the Congo had a "voice" and a chance to tell of the atrocities of king Leopold and his followers...or so they thought. It turns out that the general reports (reports were never written in detail) never were read beyond the commissioners themselves and were locked in the state archive in Brussels until 1980.
The next section of the chapter highlights Leopold's intense infatuation with France and slow building hate for all things Belgian. In his older years he traveled abroad by ship or private railway cars, spoiling Caroline with luxurious homes designed after French architecture.
Thanks to the campaign of morel and the commission inquiry reports given
to Leopold and then leaked, he was being pressured to extract himself from
the Congo. Due to the fact Leopold was becoming increasingly pressured to release his grasp over Congo he decided he would sell it and for a handsome price. He ended up selling it to Belgium in exchange for them taking over 150 million dollars in debt and paying him 50 million in gratitude and financing his building projects including the Grand Leopoldian Center for World Conferences.
Next in the chapter we learn about a man named William Morrison, a fierce ally to William Sheppard and loyal friend to Morel. Morrison encouraged many fellow ministers to speak out about the Congo atrocities. At this time missionaries and Presbyterians began being watched closely for Leopold had issued a decree mandating 5 year jail time for any calumny against a Congo Official. During the end of Leopold's rules the Compagnie du Kasai was trying to extract as much rubber as possible. The Kuba people in this region started rising against the rubber terror. The Kuban people reaped havoc on white trading posts and eventually 180 of them were killed. Sheppard wrote a story detailing how their lives went from peaceful to horrifying due to the rubber boom. The Compagnie due Kasai was outraged and exploded on Morrison and Sheppard demanding a retraction. Morrison and
Sheppard were legally vulnerable since they printed the article in the Congo which morel re-printed in Britain. Soon British vice consul started investigating and the Kasais stocks started to plummet. The company decided to legally punish Sheppard and Morrison to which they replied with a statement that they would rather go to jail than pay the fines. Morrison and Sheppard were ready to go to trial with more than a dozen Kubans by their side ready to testify in their defense. Morel called his friend and ally Emile Vandernelde and asked for a recommendation for a for a good lawyer for the men. Vandernelde revealed that he was an attorney and decided to take the case himself Pro Bono. He was a leading figure in European Democratic Socialism. When criticized by Belgians for traveling all the way to Africa to defend a couple of foreigners he replied by saying "No man is a stranger in the court of justice".
My Quiz Questions are:
1.What is the significance of the title?(Hint, last line)
2.What happened to the testimonies given by the Africans? And what does this show about the integrity or power of the commission?
3. Why was Sheppard's story about the Kubans such an outrage? What was the resulting effect of his story?
(The remaining quiz questions on Enlly's Blog Post)
The first section of this chapter highlights the movement of "African Testimony". The court system in
the Congo during that time was white ruled. White men and many African de facto officials didn't fear the legal system because it was inefficient and unjust. KL basically created a Commission of Inquiry of Rule. He sent for three commissioners who would make it their sole purpose to listen to the horrifying testimonies of the African people in the Congo. For the first time African people in the Congo had a "voice" and a chance to tell of the atrocities of king Leopold and his followers...or so they thought. It turns out that the general reports (reports were never written in detail) never were read beyond the commissioners themselves and were locked in the state archive in Brussels until 1980.
The next section of the chapter highlights Leopold's intense infatuation with France and slow building hate for all things Belgian. In his older years he traveled abroad by ship or private railway cars, spoiling Caroline with luxurious homes designed after French architecture.
Thanks to the campaign of morel and the commission inquiry reports given
to Leopold and then leaked, he was being pressured to extract himself from
the Congo. Due to the fact Leopold was becoming increasingly pressured to release his grasp over Congo he decided he would sell it and for a handsome price. He ended up selling it to Belgium in exchange for them taking over 150 million dollars in debt and paying him 50 million in gratitude and financing his building projects including the Grand Leopoldian Center for World Conferences.
Next in the chapter we learn about a man named William Morrison, a fierce ally to William Sheppard and loyal friend to Morel. Morrison encouraged many fellow ministers to speak out about the Congo atrocities. At this time missionaries and Presbyterians began being watched closely for Leopold had issued a decree mandating 5 year jail time for any calumny against a Congo Official. During the end of Leopold's rules the Compagnie du Kasai was trying to extract as much rubber as possible. The Kuba people in this region started rising against the rubber terror. The Kuban people reaped havoc on white trading posts and eventually 180 of them were killed. Sheppard wrote a story detailing how their lives went from peaceful to horrifying due to the rubber boom. The Compagnie due Kasai was outraged and exploded on Morrison and Sheppard demanding a retraction. Morrison and
Sheppard were legally vulnerable since they printed the article in the Congo which morel re-printed in Britain. Soon British vice consul started investigating and the Kasais stocks started to plummet. The company decided to legally punish Sheppard and Morrison to which they replied with a statement that they would rather go to jail than pay the fines. Morrison and Sheppard were ready to go to trial with more than a dozen Kubans by their side ready to testify in their defense. Morel called his friend and ally Emile Vandernelde and asked for a recommendation for a for a good lawyer for the men. Vandernelde revealed that he was an attorney and decided to take the case himself Pro Bono. He was a leading figure in European Democratic Socialism. When criticized by Belgians for traveling all the way to Africa to defend a couple of foreigners he replied by saying "No man is a stranger in the court of justice".
My Quiz Questions are:
1.What is the significance of the title?(Hint, last line)
2.What happened to the testimonies given by the Africans? And what does this show about the integrity or power of the commission?
3. Why was Sheppard's story about the Kubans such an outrage? What was the resulting effect of his story?
(The remaining quiz questions on Enlly's Blog Post)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)